Target intelligence
Question → dossier → evidence gaps → review
Build a target dossier, compare hypotheses, surface the missing evidence, run the next analysis and hand the whole record to a colleague. Perslis turns scattered searching into forward motion.
The value is not another answer. It is a stronger next move with the evidence still attached.
Question → dossier → evidence gaps → review
Candidate path → exact records → experiment
Objective → durable run → review gate → report
Sources + notes + failures + next questions
Drag to pan. Zoom in. Select a node to see what it does. Keyboard: Tab between nodes, Enter to inspect; arrow keys pan when the diagram is focused.
Collect papers around a question, follow their identifiers and compare the claims they support. Keep contradictory findings and missing evidence visible in an evidence map.
Explore Literature researchBuild a target dossier from sequence, structure, pathway and literature records. Compare molecular evidence without treating a database association as proof of therapeutic effect.
Explore Drug / protein researchKeep a run’s question, inputs, conditions and results together. Retain negative outcomes and failed attempts so the next experiment starts with the full record.
Explore Experiment trackingFollow connections across sources, compare hypotheses and find the gaps that deserve a test. A proposed explanation remains a hypothesis until evidence supports it.
Explore DiscoveryExplore WetHands for experiments that involve software, instruments and physical actions. Begin with a scoped pilot and review execution evidence before expanding the workflow.
Explore Lab automationA recorded example following one target across six databases.
Recorded on a research prototype. The recording shows the scope demonstrated at that time.
Explore the research floor yourself →Start with a target, a dataset or a research question. Inspect what the evidence supports, what it rejects and what remains unknown.